protecting: be more important than economic development

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents function
Weight: 0.48
, group
Weight: 0.38
, injustice
Weight: 0.36
, situation
Weight: 0.33
, work
Weight: 0.21
Siblings storing
Weight: 0.29
, immune response
Weight: 0.29
, public speaking
Weight: 0.29
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.28
, setting
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more important than economic development 1.00
be more important than development 0.94
was economic freedom important 0.82
was economic freedom 0.79
promote national development 0.79
promote development 0.79
was economic freedom important to founders 0.76
managing demand for water major priorities 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(protecting, be more important than economic development)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(protecting, be more important than economic development)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(protecting, be more important than economic development)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(protecting, be more important than development)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(protecting, be more important than economic development)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(protecting, be more important than development)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(protecting, be more important than economic development)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(protecting, be more important than development)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(protecting, be more important than economic development)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(protecting, was economic freedom important)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(protecting, be more important than economic development)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(protecting, be more important than development)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(protecting, be more important than economic development)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(protecting, was economic freedom)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(protecting, be more important than economic development)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(protecting, promote development)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(protecting, be more important than economic development)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(protecting, promote national development)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(protecting, be more important than economic development)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(protecting, was economic freedom)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(protecting, be more important than economic development)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(protecting, was economic freedom important)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(protecting, be more important than economic development)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(protecting, was economic freedom important)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(protecting, be more important than economic development)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(protecting, was economic freedom important to founders)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(protecting, be more important than economic development)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(protecting, managing demand for water major priorities)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(protecting, be more important than economic development)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(protecting, was economic freedom important)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(protecting, be more important than economic development)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(protecting, promote development)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(protecting, be more important than economic development)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(protecting, promote national development)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(protecting, be more important than economic development)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(protecting, was economic freedom important to founders)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(protecting, be more important than economic development)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(protecting, promote development)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(protecting, be more important than economic development)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(protecting, managing demand for water major priorities)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(protecting, be more important than economic development)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(protecting, was economic freedom)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(protecting, be more important than economic development)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(protecting, promote national development)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(protecting, be more important than economic development)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(protecting, promote development)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(protecting, be more important than economic development)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(protecting, was economic freedom)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(protecting, be more important than economic development)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(protecting, promote national development)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(protecting, be more important than economic development)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(protecting, was economic freedom important to founders)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(protecting, be more important than economic development)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(protecting, managing demand for water major priorities)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(protecting, be more important than economic development)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(protecting, was economic freedom important to founders)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(protecting, be more important than economic development)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(protecting, managing demand for water major priorities)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(protecting, be more important than economic development)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(protecting, be more important than economic development)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(protecting, be more important than economic development)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(protecting, be more important than economic development)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(protecting, be more important than economic development)