prussia: was strong

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.51
, power
Weight: 0.45
, state
Weight: 0.42
, nation
Weight: 0.41
, enemy
Weight: 0.40
Siblings central african republic
Weight: 0.27
, central american country
Weight: 0.27
, czech republic
Weight: 0.27
, west germany
Weight: 0.27
, region
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
was strong 1.00
is strong 0.97
was economically strong 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(enemy, is strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(prussia, was strong)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(prussia, was strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(enemy, is strong)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(prussia, was strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(enemy, is strong)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(enemy, is strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(prussia, was strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(prussia, was strong)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(prussia, was strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(prussia, was strong)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(prussia, was strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(prussia, is strong)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(prussia, was strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(prussia, is strong)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(prussia, was strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(prussia, is strong)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(prussia, was strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(prussia, is strong)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(prussia, was strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(prussia, was economically strong)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(prussia, was strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(prussia, was economically strong)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(prussia, was strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(prussia, was economically strong)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(prussia, was strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(prussia, was economically strong)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(prussia, was strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(prussia, was strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(prussia, was strong)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(prussia, was strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(prussia, was strong)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(prussia, was strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(enemy, is strong)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(prussia, was strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(enemy, is strong)