psychiatrist: ask count backwards

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents medical doctor
Weight: 0.74
, specialist
Weight: 0.65
, mental illness
Weight: 0.62
, professional
Weight: 0.61
, witness
Weight: 0.61
Siblings psychologist
Weight: 0.38
, surgeon
Weight: 0.36
, obstetrician
Weight: 0.36
, physician
Weight: 0.36
, dentist
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
ask count backwards 1.00
ask remember 0.79
know asking 0.77
do 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(psychiatrist, ask count backwards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(psychologist, do)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(psychiatrist, ask count backwards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(psychologist, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(psychologist, do)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(psychiatrist, ask count backwards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(psychiatrist, ask count backwards)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(psychiatrist, ask count backwards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(psychiatrist, do)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(psychiatrist, ask count backwards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(psychiatrist, do)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(psychiatrist, ask count backwards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(psychiatrist, do)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(psychiatrist, ask count backwards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(psychiatrist, ask remember)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(psychiatrist, ask count backwards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(psychiatrist, ask remember)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(psychiatrist, ask count backwards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(psychiatrist, ask remember)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(psychiatrist, ask count backwards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(psychiatrist, ask remember)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(psychiatrist, ask count backwards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(psychiatrist, do)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(psychiatrist, ask count backwards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(psychiatrist, ask count backwards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(psychiatrist, ask count backwards)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(psychiatrist, ask count backwards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(psychiatrist, ask count backwards)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(psychiatrist, ask count backwards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(psychologist, do)