psychologist: be interested in ability measure in humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents counselor
Weight: 0.70
, doctor
Weight: 0.68
, specialist
Weight: 0.68
, researcher
Weight: 0.61
, expert
Weight: 0.57
Siblings jean piaget
Weight: 0.57
, psychiatrist
Weight: 0.38
, computer scientist
Weight: 0.37
, author
Weight: 0.36
, medical doctor
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be interested in ability measure in humans 1.00
be interested in ability measure 0.96
be greatly interested in study 0.78
be interested in system 0.78
be interested in space 0.76
be interested in personal space 0.76
be interested in biological matters 0.76
be interested in nature-nurture issue 0.75
be interested in issue 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(psychologist, be interested in ability measure in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(psychologist, be interested in ability measure in humans)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(psychologist, be interested in ability measure in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(psychologist, be interested in system)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(psychologist, be interested in ability measure in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(psychologist, be interested in personal space)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(psychologist, be interested in ability measure in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(psychologist, be interested in nature-nurture issue)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(psychologist, be interested in ability measure in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(psychologist, be interested in biological matters)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(psychologist, be interested in ability measure in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(psychologist, be interested in personal space)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(psychologist, be interested in ability measure in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(psychologist, be interested in biological matters)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(psychologist, be interested in ability measure in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(psychologist, be interested in system)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(psychologist, be interested in ability measure in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(psychologist, be interested in personal space)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(psychologist, be interested in ability measure in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(psychologist, be interested in system)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(psychologist, be interested in ability measure in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(psychologist, be interested in biological matters)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(psychologist, be interested in ability measure in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(psychologist, be interested in personal space)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(psychologist, be interested in ability measure in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(psychologist, be interested in system)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(psychologist, be interested in ability measure in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(psychologist, be interested in biological matters)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(psychologist, be interested in ability measure in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(psychologist, be interested in nature-nurture issue)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(psychologist, be interested in ability measure in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(psychologist, be interested in nature-nurture issue)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(psychologist, be interested in ability measure in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(psychologist, be interested in nature-nurture issue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(psychologist, be interested in ability measure in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(psychologist, be interested in ability measure in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(psychologist, be interested in ability measure in humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(psychologist, be interested in ability measure in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(psychologist, be interested in ability measure in humans)