pub: have funny names

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents location
Weight: 0.60
, place
Weight: 0.58
, establishment
Weight: 0.58
, club
Weight: 0.57
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.64
, cafe
Weight: 0.34
, bar
Weight: 0.34
, nightclub
Weight: 0.34
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have funny names 1.00
have weird names 0.93
have names 0.87
have same names 0.85
have two names 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(place, have names)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(pub, have funny names)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(pub, have funny names)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(place, have names)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pub, have funny names)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(place, have names)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(place, have names)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(pub, have funny names)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(pub, have funny names)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(pub, have funny names)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(pub, have funny names)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(pub, have funny names)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(pub, have weird names)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(pub, have funny names)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pub, have weird names)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(pub, have funny names)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pub, have weird names)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(pub, have funny names)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(pub, have names)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(pub, have funny names)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(pub, have names)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(pub, have funny names)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(pub, have same names)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(pub, have funny names)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(pub, have same names)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(pub, have funny names)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(pub, have two names)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(pub, have funny names)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(pub, have names)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(pub, have funny names)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(pub, have two names)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(pub, have funny names)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(pub, have same names)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(pub, have funny names)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(pub, have two names)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(pub, have funny names)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(pub, have weird names)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(pub, have funny names)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pub, have names)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(pub, have funny names)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(pub, have two names)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(pub, have funny names)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(pub, have same names)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(pub, have funny names)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(pub, have funny names)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pub, have funny names)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(pub, have funny names)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(pub, have funny names)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pub, have funny names)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(place, have names)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(pub, have funny names)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(place, have names)