pubic hair: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hair
Weight: 0.65
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, puberty
Weight: 0.61
, characteristic
Weight: 0.61
, woman
Weight: 0.56
Siblings hair color
Weight: 0.41
, hair dryer
Weight: 0.40
, hair follicle
Weight: 0.39
, hair gel
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(hair, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pubic hair, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(characteristic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pubic hair, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(puberty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pubic hair, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pubic hair, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(puberty, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pubic hair, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pubic hair, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(hair, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(pubic hair, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(puberty, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(pubic hair, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(characteristic, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(pubic hair, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(hair, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(pubic hair, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(hair gel, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(pubic hair, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(hair dryer, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(hair, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(pubic hair, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pubic hair, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(characteristic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(pubic hair, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pubic hair, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(puberty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(pubic hair, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pubic hair, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pubic hair, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(hair gel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(hair gel, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pubic hair, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(hair dryer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(hair dryer, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pubic hair, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(pubic hair, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(pubic hair, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pubic hair, has quality good)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(pubic hair, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(pubic hair, has quality good)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pubic hair, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(pubic hair, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(pubic hair, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pubic hair, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(pubic hair, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pubic hair, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(pubic hair, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pubic hair, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pubic hair, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(pubic hair, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(puberty, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(pubic hair, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(pubic hair, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(hair, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(pubic hair, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(hair gel, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(pubic hair, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(hair dryer, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(pubic hair, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(puberty, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(pubic hair, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(pubic hair, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(hair, has quality good)