publisher: be better than word

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents journalist
Weight: 0.61
, software
Weight: 0.61
, web site
Weight: 0.61
, third party
Weight: 0.59
, distributor
Weight: 0.59
Siblings blogger
Weight: 0.59
, editor
Weight: 0.36
, text editor
Weight: 0.34
, web browser
Weight: 0.32
, political party
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than word 1.00
feel about words 0.78
feel about swear words 0.77
get worse 0.76
be weaker than than past 0.76
be weaker now than in past 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(software, get worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(publisher, be better than word)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(publisher, be better than word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(software, get worse)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(publisher, be better than word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(software, get worse)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(publisher, be better than word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(political party, be weaker now than in past)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(publisher, be better than word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(political party, be weaker than than past)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(software, get worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(publisher, be better than word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(publisher, be better than word)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(publisher, be better than word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(political party, be weaker now than in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(political party, be weaker now than in past)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(publisher, be better than word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(political party, be weaker than than past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(political party, be weaker than than past)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(publisher, be better than word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(publisher, be better than word)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(publisher, be better than word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(publisher, feel about words)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(publisher, be better than word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(publisher, feel about swear words)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(publisher, be better than word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(publisher, feel about words)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(publisher, be better than word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(publisher, feel about words)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(publisher, be better than word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(publisher, feel about swear words)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(publisher, be better than word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(publisher, feel about words)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(publisher, be better than word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(publisher, feel about swear words)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(publisher, be better than word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(publisher, feel about swear words)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(publisher, be better than word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(publisher, be better than word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(publisher, be better than word)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(publisher, be better than word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(publisher, be better than word)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(publisher, be better than word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(software, get worse)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(publisher, be better than word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(political party, be weaker now than in past)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(publisher, be better than word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(political party, be weaker than than past)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(publisher, be better than word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(software, get worse)