publisher: use design on card

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents journalist
Weight: 0.61
, software
Weight: 0.61
, web site
Weight: 0.61
, third party
Weight: 0.59
, distributor
Weight: 0.59
Siblings blogger
Weight: 0.59
, editor
Weight: 0.36
, text editor
Weight: 0.34
, web browser
Weight: 0.32
, political party
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
use design on card 1.00
have design 0.84
have dark design 0.79
do most tv sound design 0.76
do tv sound design 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(software, have design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(publisher, use design on card)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(publisher, use design on card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(software, have design)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(publisher, use design on card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(software, have design)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(publisher, use design on card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(editor, do tv sound design)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(publisher, use design on card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(editor, do most tv sound design)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(software, have design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(publisher, use design on card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(publisher, use design on card)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(publisher, use design on card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(editor, do tv sound design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(editor, do tv sound design)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(publisher, use design on card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(editor, do most tv sound design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(editor, do most tv sound design)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(publisher, use design on card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(publisher, use design on card)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(publisher, use design on card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(publisher, use design on card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(publisher, use design on card)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(publisher, use design on card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(publisher, use design on card)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(publisher, use design on card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(software, have design)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(publisher, use design on card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(editor, do tv sound design)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(publisher, use design on card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(editor, do most tv sound design)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(publisher, use design on card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(software, have design)