:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Property |
Similarity |
drool |
1.00 |
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pug, drool)
⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(beagle, drool)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pug, drool)
⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(chihuahua, drool)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pug, drool)
⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, drool)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(pug, drool)
⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(beagle, drool)
⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(beagle, drool)
Salient implies Plausible
0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(pug, drool)
⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(pug, drool)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(pug, drool)
⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(pug, drool)
⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pug, drool)
Typical implies Plausible
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(pug, drool)
⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(pug, drool)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pug, drool)
⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(beagle, drool)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pug, drool)
⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(chihuahua, drool)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pug, drool)
⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(dachshund, drool)