pug: have flat faces

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.71
, small dog
Weight: 0.64
, animal
Weight: 0.64
, puppy
Weight: 0.63
, breed
Weight: 0.61
Siblings beagle
Weight: 0.40
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.39
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.39
, dachshund
Weight: 0.39
, chihuahua
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have flat faces 1.00
be faces flat 1.00
have flat face 0.94
have black faces 0.87
has physical part faces 0.84
have weird faces 0.84
has face 0.84
face 0.82
faces stink 0.80
rub faces 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pug, have flat faces)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(pug, have flat faces)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(pug, have flat faces)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(pug, has face)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(pug, have flat faces)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(pug, face)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pug, have flat faces)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(pug, face)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pug, have flat faces)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(pug, has face)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(pug, have flat faces)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(pug, has physical part faces)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(pug, have flat faces)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(pug, face)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(pug, have flat faces)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(pug, have weird faces)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(pug, have flat faces)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(pug, has face)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pug, have flat faces)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(pug, has physical part faces)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(pug, have flat faces)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pug, have weird faces)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pug, have flat faces)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(pug, have weird faces)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(pug, have flat faces)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pug, has physical part faces)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(pug, have flat faces)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(pug, has physical part faces)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(pug, have flat faces)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(pug, have weird faces)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(pug, have flat faces)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(pug, face)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(pug, have flat faces)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(pug, has face)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(pug, have flat faces)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pug, have flat faces)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(pug, have flat faces)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pug, have flat faces)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pug, have flat faces)