pug: lick furniture

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.71
, small dog
Weight: 0.64
, animal
Weight: 0.64
, puppy
Weight: 0.63
, breed
Weight: 0.61
Siblings beagle
Weight: 0.40
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.39
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.39
, dachshund
Weight: 0.39
, chihuahua
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
lick furniture 1.00
lick lot 0.80
lick nose 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(pug, lick furniture)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, lick furniture)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(pug, lick furniture)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(dachshund, lick furniture)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(dachshund, lick furniture)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(pug, lick furniture)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(pug, lick furniture)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(pug, lick furniture)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(pug, lick nose)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(pug, lick furniture)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pug, lick nose)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(pug, lick furniture)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(pug, lick nose)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(pug, lick furniture)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(pug, lick nose)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(pug, lick furniture)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(pug, lick lot)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(pug, lick furniture)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pug, lick lot)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(pug, lick furniture)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(pug, lick lot)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(pug, lick furniture)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(pug, lick lot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(pug, lick furniture)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(pug, lick furniture)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(pug, lick furniture)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(pug, lick furniture)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(pug, lick furniture)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(pug, lick furniture)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(dachshund, lick furniture)