pull: be up exercise

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.55
, force
Weight: 0.52
, feature
Weight: 0.51
, problem
Weight: 0.45
Siblings yank
Weight: 0.33
, push
Weight: 0.32
, come
Weight: 0.32
, think
Weight: 0.32
, keep
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be up exercise 1.00
be up best exercise 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pull, be up exercise)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(push, be up exercise)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pull, be up exercise)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(push, be up best exercise)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pull, be up exercise)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(push, be up exercise)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(push, be up exercise)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pull, be up exercise)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(push, be up best exercise)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(push, be up best exercise)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pull, be up exercise)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(pull, be up exercise)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(pull, be up exercise)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(pull, be up best exercise)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pull, be up exercise)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(pull, be up best exercise)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pull, be up exercise)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(pull, be up best exercise)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(pull, be up exercise)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pull, be up best exercise)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(pull, be up exercise)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pull, be up exercise)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pull, be up exercise)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pull, be up exercise)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pull, be up exercise)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pull, be up exercise)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(push, be up exercise)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pull, be up exercise)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(push, be up best exercise)