pull: has quality system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.55
, force
Weight: 0.52
, feature
Weight: 0.51
, problem
Weight: 0.45
Siblings yank
Weight: 0.33
, push
Weight: 0.32
, come
Weight: 0.32
, think
Weight: 0.32
, keep
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality system 1.00
has quality good 0.84
has quality bad 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pull, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(yank, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pull, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(yank, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(pull, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(yank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(yank, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(pull, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(yank, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(yank, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(pull, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(pull, has quality system)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(pull, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pull, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(pull, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pull, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(pull, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(pull, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(pull, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(pull, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(pull, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(pull, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(pull, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(pull, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(pull, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(pull, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(pull, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pull, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(pull, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pull, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pull, has quality system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(pull, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pull, has quality system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pull, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(yank, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pull, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(yank, has quality good)