pulp: be a part of tooth

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fiber
Weight: 0.58
, raw material
Weight: 0.58
, industry
Weight: 0.57
, fruit
Weight: 0.57
, chemical
Weight: 0.55
Siblings wood pulp
Weight: 0.38
, lumber
Weight: 0.34
, wood
Weight: 0.33
, sugar
Weight: 0.33
, steel
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be a part of tooth 1.00
decay your tooth 0.83
be used to eliminate sweet tooth 0.83
be used to rot your tooth 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(pulp, be a part of tooth)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(sugar, decay your tooth)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(pulp, be a part of tooth)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(sugar, be used to rot your tooth)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(pulp, be a part of tooth)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sugar, be used to eliminate sweet tooth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(pulp, be a part of tooth)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(sugar, be used to eliminate sweet tooth)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(sugar, be used to eliminate sweet tooth)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(pulp, be a part of tooth)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(sugar, be used to rot your tooth)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(sugar, be used to rot your tooth)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(pulp, be a part of tooth)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(sugar, decay your tooth)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(sugar, decay your tooth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(pulp, be a part of tooth)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(pulp, be a part of tooth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(pulp, be a part of tooth)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(pulp, be a part of tooth)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(pulp, be a part of tooth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(pulp, be a part of tooth)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(pulp, be a part of tooth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(pulp, be a part of tooth)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(sugar, decay your tooth)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(pulp, be a part of tooth)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(sugar, be used to rot your tooth)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(pulp, be a part of tooth)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(sugar, be used to eliminate sweet tooth)