puma: be better than adidas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.60
, predator
Weight: 0.60
, mammal
Weight: 0.59
, shoe
Weight: 0.56
Siblings cougar
Weight: 0.36
, great horned owl
Weight: 0.35
, cheetah
Weight: 0.35
, coyote
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than adidas 1.00
be than better nike 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(puma, be better than adidas)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(puma, be better than adidas)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(puma, be better than adidas)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(puma, be than better nike)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(puma, be better than adidas)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(puma, be than better nike)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(puma, be better than adidas)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(puma, be than better nike)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(puma, be better than adidas)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(puma, be than better nike)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(puma, be better than adidas)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(puma, be better than adidas)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(puma, be better than adidas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(puma, be better than adidas)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(puma, be better than adidas)