puma: has physical part heads

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.60
, predator
Weight: 0.60
, mammal
Weight: 0.59
, shoe
Weight: 0.56
Siblings cougar
Weight: 0.36
, great horned owl
Weight: 0.35
, cheetah
Weight: 0.35
, coyote
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part heads 1.00
have small heads 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(puma, has physical part heads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cheetah, have small heads)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(puma, has physical part heads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(cheetah, have small heads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(cheetah, have small heads)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(puma, has physical part heads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(puma, has physical part heads)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(puma, has physical part heads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(puma, have small heads)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(puma, has physical part heads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(puma, have small heads)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(puma, has physical part heads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(puma, have small heads)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(puma, has physical part heads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(puma, have small heads)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(puma, has physical part heads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(puma, has physical part heads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(puma, has physical part heads)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(puma, has physical part heads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(puma, has physical part heads)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(puma, has physical part heads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(cheetah, have small heads)