puppet: has quality bad

Related concepts

Parents	thing Weight: 0.60 , item Weight: 0.54 , toy Weight: 0.53 , media Weight: 0.51 , figure Weight: 0.50
Siblings	geisha Weight: 0.42 , clown Weight: 0.34 , doll Weight: 0.32 , muppet Weight: 0.32 , circus Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality bad	1.00
has quality good	0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(media, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(puppet, has quality bad)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(toy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(puppet, has quality bad)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(toy, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(puppet, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(puppet, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(toy, has quality bad)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(puppet, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(media, has quality bad)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(puppet, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(toy, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(puppet, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(toy, has quality bad)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(puppet, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(media, has quality bad)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(puppet, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(toy, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(puppet, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(doll, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(puppet, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(clown, has quality bad)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(puppet, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(circus, has quality bad)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(puppet, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(circus, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(media, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(puppet, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(puppet, has quality bad)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(toy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(puppet, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(puppet, has quality bad)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(toy, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(puppet, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(puppet, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(puppet, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(circus, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(circus, has quality bad)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(puppet, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(circus, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(circus, has quality good)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(puppet, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(clown, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(clown, has quality bad)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(puppet, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(doll, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(doll, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(puppet, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(puppet, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(puppet, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(puppet, has quality good)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(puppet, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Salient(puppet, has quality good)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(puppet, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(puppet, has quality good)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.46

Typical(puppet, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(puppet, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(puppet, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(puppet, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(puppet, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(puppet, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(puppet, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(puppet, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(toy, has quality bad)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(puppet, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(toy, has quality good)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(puppet, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(media, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(puppet, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(doll, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(puppet, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(circus, has quality bad)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(puppet, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(circus, has quality good)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(puppet, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(clown, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.46

Typical(puppet, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(toy, has quality bad)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.46

Typical(puppet, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(toy, has quality good)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.46

Typical(puppet, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(media, has quality bad)