puppy: itch ears

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.66
, thing
Weight: 0.61
, baby
Weight: 0.59
, animal
Weight: 0.58
, friend
Weight: 0.57
Siblings cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.70
, pug
Weight: 0.63
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.60
, great dane
Weight: 0.54
, jack russell
Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property Similarity
itch ears 1.00
has physical part ears 0.81
have closed at ears 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(puppy, itch ears)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part ears)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(puppy, itch ears)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(great dane, has physical part ears)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(puppy, itch ears)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, has physical part ears)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(puppy, itch ears)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(great dane, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(great dane, has physical part ears)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(puppy, itch ears)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(puppy, itch ears)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(puppy, itch ears)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(puppy, has physical part ears)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(puppy, itch ears)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(puppy, has physical part ears)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(puppy, itch ears)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(puppy, has physical part ears)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(puppy, itch ears)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(puppy, have closed at ears)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(puppy, itch ears)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(puppy, have closed at ears)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(puppy, itch ears)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(puppy, have closed at ears)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(puppy, itch ears)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(puppy, has physical part ears)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(puppy, itch ears)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(puppy, have closed at ears)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(puppy, itch ears)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(puppy, itch ears)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(puppy, itch ears)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(puppy, itch ears)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(puppy, itch ears)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(puppy, itch ears)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, has physical part ears)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(puppy, itch ears)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(great dane, has physical part ears)