puzzle: be at toy store

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.64
, content
Weight: 0.61
, element
Weight: 0.60
, computer game
Weight: 0.60
Siblings crossword puzzle
Weight: 0.77
, jigsaw puzzle
Weight: 0.65
, problem
Weight: 0.65
, obstacle
Weight: 0.56
, mystery
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at toy store 1.00
be at toy shop 0.96
be buy at store 0.79
be at toy r us 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(thing, be buy at store)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(puzzle, be at toy store)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(puzzle, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(thing, be buy at store)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(puzzle, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(thing, be buy at store)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(thing, be buy at store)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(puzzle, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(puzzle, be at toy store)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(puzzle, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(puzzle, be at toy store)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(puzzle, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(puzzle, be at toy shop)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(puzzle, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(puzzle, be at toy shop)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(puzzle, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(puzzle, be at toy shop)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(puzzle, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(puzzle, be at toy shop)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(puzzle, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(puzzle, be at toy r us)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(puzzle, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(puzzle, be at toy r us)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(puzzle, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(puzzle, be at toy r us)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(puzzle, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(puzzle, be at toy r us)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(puzzle, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(puzzle, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(puzzle, be at toy store)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(puzzle, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(puzzle, be at toy store)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(puzzle, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(thing, be buy at store)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(puzzle, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(thing, be buy at store)