quantum mechanics: need numbers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents theory
Weight: 0.65
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, topic
Weight: 0.55
, concept
Weight: 0.53
, science
Weight: 0.51
Siblings quantum physics
Weight: 0.38
, quantum
Weight: 0.34
, relativity
Weight: 0.34
, string theory
Weight: 0.33
, big bang theory
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
need numbers 1.00
use numbers 0.94
need complex numbers 0.89
use complex numbers 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(quantum mechanics, need numbers)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(quantum mechanics, need numbers)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(quantum mechanics, need numbers)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(quantum mechanics, use numbers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(quantum mechanics, need numbers)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(quantum mechanics, use numbers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(quantum mechanics, need numbers)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(quantum mechanics, use complex numbers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(quantum mechanics, need numbers)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(quantum mechanics, use numbers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(quantum mechanics, need numbers)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(quantum mechanics, need complex numbers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(quantum mechanics, need numbers)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(quantum mechanics, use numbers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(quantum mechanics, need numbers)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(quantum mechanics, use complex numbers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(quantum mechanics, need numbers)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(quantum mechanics, use complex numbers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(quantum mechanics, need numbers)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(quantum mechanics, use complex numbers)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(quantum mechanics, need numbers)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(quantum mechanics, need complex numbers)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(quantum mechanics, need numbers)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(quantum mechanics, need complex numbers)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(quantum mechanics, need numbers)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(quantum mechanics, need complex numbers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(quantum mechanics, need numbers)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(quantum mechanics, need numbers)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(quantum mechanics, need numbers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(quantum mechanics, need numbers)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(quantum mechanics, need numbers)