quebec city: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.83
, town
Weight: 0.76
, place
Weight: 0.64
, location
Weight: 0.62
, market
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mexico city
Weight: 0.40
, new york city
Weight: 0.39
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.39
, municipality
Weight: 0.38
, quebec
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(city, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(quebec city, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(quebec city, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(city, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(quebec city, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(city, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(quebec city, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(new york city, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(city, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(quebec city, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(quebec city, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(quebec city, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(new york city, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(new york city, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(quebec city, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(quebec city, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(quebec city, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(quebec city, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(quebec city, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(quebec city, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(quebec city, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(quebec city, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(city, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(quebec city, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(new york city, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(quebec city, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(city, is expensive)