queen elizabeth: has state second

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents queen
Weight: 0.78
, monarch
Weight: 0.71
, woman
Weight: 0.69
, royal
Weight: 0.67
, princess
Weight: 0.66
Siblings elizabeth
Weight: 0.62
, king
Weight: 0.38
, lydia
Weight: 0.36
, grandmother
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state second 1.00
be called second 0.88
is second important 0.87
is second famous 0.83
is first called 0.80
is first important 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(queen elizabeth, has state second)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(elizabeth, be called second)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(queen elizabeth, has state second)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(elizabeth, be called second)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(elizabeth, be called second)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(queen elizabeth, has state second)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(queen elizabeth, has state second)

Similarity expansion

0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(queen elizabeth, has state second)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(queen elizabeth, is second important)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(queen elizabeth, has state second)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(queen elizabeth, is second important)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(queen elizabeth, has state second)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(queen elizabeth, is first important)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(queen elizabeth, has state second)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(queen elizabeth, is first important)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(queen elizabeth, has state second)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(queen elizabeth, is second important)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(queen elizabeth, has state second)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(queen elizabeth, is first important)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(queen elizabeth, has state second)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(queen elizabeth, is second important)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(queen elizabeth, has state second)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(queen elizabeth, is first important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(queen elizabeth, has state second)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(queen elizabeth, has state second)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(queen elizabeth, has state second)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(queen elizabeth, has state second)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(queen elizabeth, has state second)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(queen elizabeth, has state second)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(elizabeth, be called second)