question: is valuable

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents challenge
Weight: 0.66
, answer
Weight: 0.65
, consideration
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.62
Siblings fairness
Weight: 0.66
, big bang
Weight: 0.65
, argument
Weight: 0.62
, penis
Weight: 0.59
, rumor
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
is valuable 1.00
be important to gilgamesh 0.81
is more important 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(question, is valuable)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(question, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(question, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(issue, be important to gilgamesh)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(question, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(question, is valuable)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(question, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(question, is valuable)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(question, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(question, is more important)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(question, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(question, is more important)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(question, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(question, is more important)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(question, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(question, is more important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(question, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(question, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(question, is valuable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(question, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(question, is valuable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(question, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(issue, be important to gilgamesh)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(question, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(issue, be important to gilgamesh)