:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(raccoon, survive)
⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(bobcat, survive)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(raccoon, survive)
⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(skunk, survive)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(raccoon, survive)
⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(coyote, survive)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(raccoon, survive)
⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(raccoon, survive)
Similarity expansion
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(raccoon, survive)
⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(raccoon, survive)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(raccoon, survive)
⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(bobcat, survive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(raccoon, survive)
⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(skunk, survive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(raccoon, survive)
⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(coyote, survive)