race: be with people

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents campaign
Weight: 0.62
, fault line
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.61
, variable
Weight: 0.61
Siblings marathon
Weight: 0.69
, relay
Weight: 0.65
, run
Weight: 0.65
, derby
Weight: 0.62
, dwarf
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with people 1.00
be by 1/2 people 0.92
be important to people 0.88
be such issue with people 0.83
be in families 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(race, be with people)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(run, be by 1/2 people)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(race, be with people)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(run, be in families)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(race, be with people)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(run, be by 1/2 people)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(run, be by 1/2 people)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(race, be with people)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(run, be in families)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(run, be in families)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(race, be with people)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(race, be with people)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(race, be with people)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(race, be important to people)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(race, be with people)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(race, be such issue with people)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(race, be with people)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(race, be important to people)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(race, be with people)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(race, be such issue with people)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(race, be with people)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(race, be important to people)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(race, be with people)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(race, be such issue with people)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(race, be with people)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(race, be important to people)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(race, be with people)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(race, be such issue with people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(race, be with people)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(race, be with people)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(race, be with people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(race, be with people)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(race, be with people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(race, be with people)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(run, be by 1/2 people)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(race, be with people)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(run, be in families)