racists: have melting faces

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
have melting faces 1.00
has physical part faces 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(racists, have melting faces)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(racists, have melting faces)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(racists, have melting faces)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(racists, has physical part faces)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(racists, have melting faces)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(racists, has physical part faces)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(racists, have melting faces)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(racists, has physical part faces)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(racists, have melting faces)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(racists, has physical part faces)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(racists, have melting faces)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(racists, have melting faces)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(racists, have melting faces)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(racists, have melting faces)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(racists, have melting faces)