:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(device, be able)
⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(radar, is unable)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(radar, is unable)
⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(device, be able)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(radar, is unable)
⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(device, be able)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
Similarity expansion
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(radar, is unable)
⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(radar, be able)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(radar, is unable)
⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(radar, be able)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(radar, is unable)
⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(radar, be able)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(radar, is unable)
⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(radar, be able)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(radar, is unable)
⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(device, be able)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child