radar: were used back then

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents equipment
Weight: 0.60
, field
Weight: 0.60
, tool
Weight: 0.59
, system
Weight: 0.59
, device
Weight: 0.59
Siblings smoke detector
Weight: 0.32
, satellite
Weight: 0.32
, telescope
Weight: 0.32
, sonar
Weight: 0.32
, electronic device
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
were used back then 1.00
were used back 0.97
were used then 0.96
be used now 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(radar, were used back then) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(radar, were used back then)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(radar, were used back then) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(radar, were used back)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(radar, were used back then) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(radar, were used back)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(radar, were used back then) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(radar, were used back)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(radar, were used back then) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(radar, were used then)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(radar, were used back then) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(radar, were used back)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(radar, were used back then) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(radar, were used then)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(radar, were used back then) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(radar, be used now)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(radar, were used back then) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(radar, be used now)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(radar, were used back then) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(radar, were used then)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(radar, were used back then) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(radar, be used now)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(radar, were used back then) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(radar, were used then)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(radar, were used back then) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(radar, be used now)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(radar, were used back then) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(radar, were used back then) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(radar, were used back then)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(radar, were used back then) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(radar, were used back then)