radiation: be different from other types of heat transfer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hazard
Weight: 0.62
, cause
Weight: 0.58
, treatment
Weight: 0.57
, force
Weight: 0.57
Siblings gamma radiation
Weight: 0.77
, irradiation
Weight: 0.33
, air pollution
Weight: 0.33
, chemical
Weight: 0.33
, smoke
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different from other types of heat transfer 1.00
be different than other methods of energy transfer 0.88
be different from convection in heat transfer 0.84
transfer more easily through gas 0.81
differ for tranference of heat 0.80
be different from light 0.79
be different 0.79
differ for transference of heat 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(force, be different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(radiation, be different from other types of heat transfer)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(hazard, be different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(radiation, be different from other types of heat transfer)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(radiation, be different from other types of heat transfer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(hazard, be different)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(radiation, be different from other types of heat transfer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(force, be different)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(radiation, be different from other types of heat transfer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hazard, be different)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(radiation, be different from other types of heat transfer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(force, be different)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(radiation, be different from other types of heat transfer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(chemical, be different)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(force, be different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(radiation, be different from other types of heat transfer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(radiation, be different from other types of heat transfer)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(hazard, be different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(radiation, be different from other types of heat transfer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(radiation, be different from other types of heat transfer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(radiation, be different from other types of heat transfer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(chemical, be different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(chemical, be different)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(radiation, be different from other types of heat transfer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(radiation, be different from other types of heat transfer)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(radiation, be different from other types of heat transfer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(radiation, be different than other methods of energy transfer)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(radiation, be different from other types of heat transfer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(radiation, be different than other methods of energy transfer)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(radiation, be different from other types of heat transfer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(radiation, be different than other methods of energy transfer)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(radiation, be different from other types of heat transfer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(radiation, be different from light)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(radiation, be different from other types of heat transfer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(radiation, be different from light)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(radiation, be different from other types of heat transfer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(radiation, be different than other methods of energy transfer)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(radiation, be different from other types of heat transfer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(radiation, be different from light)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(radiation, be different from other types of heat transfer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(radiation, be different)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(radiation, be different from other types of heat transfer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(radiation, be different from light)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(radiation, be different from other types of heat transfer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(radiation, be different)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(radiation, be different from other types of heat transfer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(radiation, be different)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(radiation, be different from other types of heat transfer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(radiation, be different)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(radiation, be different from other types of heat transfer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(radiation, be different from other types of heat transfer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(radiation, be different from other types of heat transfer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(radiation, be different from other types of heat transfer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(radiation, be different from other types of heat transfer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(radiation, be different from other types of heat transfer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(hazard, be different)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(radiation, be different from other types of heat transfer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(force, be different)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(radiation, be different from other types of heat transfer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(chemical, be different)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(radiation, be different from other types of heat transfer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(hazard, be different)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(radiation, be different from other types of heat transfer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(force, be different)