radiation: leads to cancer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hazard
Weight: 0.62
, cause
Weight: 0.58
, treatment
Weight: 0.57
, force
Weight: 0.57
, modality
Weight: 0.57
Siblings gamma radiation
Weight: 0.77
, irradiation
Weight: 0.33
, air pollution
Weight: 0.33
, chemical
Weight: 0.33
, smoke
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
leads to cancer 1.00
cause cancer 0.84
give cancer 0.84
causes cancer 0.83
be used for cancer treatment 0.81
affect cancer cells 0.80
be given to cancer patients 0.80
control cancer 0.80
be used for breast cancer 0.80
be used in cancer therapy 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(radiation, leads to cancer)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(smoke, give cancer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(radiation, leads to cancer)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(smoke, give cancer)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(smoke, give cancer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(radiation, leads to cancer)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(radiation, leads to cancer)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(radiation, leads to cancer)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(radiation, give cancer)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(radiation, leads to cancer)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(radiation, give cancer)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(radiation, leads to cancer)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(radiation, give cancer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(radiation, leads to cancer)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(radiation, causes cancer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(radiation, leads to cancer)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(radiation, cause cancer)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(radiation, leads to cancer)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(radiation, cause cancer)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(radiation, leads to cancer)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(radiation, causes cancer)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(radiation, leads to cancer)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(radiation, causes cancer)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(radiation, leads to cancer)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(radiation, cause cancer)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(radiation, leads to cancer)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(radiation, give cancer)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(radiation, leads to cancer)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(radiation, control cancer)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(radiation, leads to cancer)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(radiation, control cancer)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(radiation, leads to cancer)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(radiation, control cancer)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(radiation, leads to cancer)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(radiation, cause cancer)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(radiation, leads to cancer)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(radiation, causes cancer)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(radiation, leads to cancer)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(radiation, control cancer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(radiation, leads to cancer)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(radiation, leads to cancer)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(radiation, leads to cancer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(radiation, leads to cancer)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(radiation, leads to cancer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(radiation, leads to cancer)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(smoke, give cancer)