radiator: be hot at top at bottom

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cooling device
Weight: 0.68
, heating element
Weight: 0.62
, heater
Weight: 0.56
, application
Weight: 0.55
, unit
Weight: 0.54
Siblings hose
Weight: 0.54
, heat sink
Weight: 0.34
, electric heater
Weight: 0.33
, compressor
Weight: 0.33
, heat
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be hot at top at bottom 1.00
be hot at bottom 0.97
be hot at top 0.95
be warm at top at bottom 0.94
get at top 0.90
be cold at bottom 0.89
be warm at bottom 0.87
stay at bottom 0.87
be cold at top 0.87
be warm at top 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be hot at bottom)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be warm at top at bottom)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(radiator, be hot at bottom)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(radiator, be hot at bottom)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(radiator, be warm at top at bottom)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(radiator, be warm at top at bottom)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be hot at top)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(radiator, be hot at top)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be warm at bottom)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(radiator, be warm at bottom)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(radiator, be warm at bottom)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(radiator, stay at bottom)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(radiator, be hot at top)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(radiator, stay at bottom)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(radiator, stay at bottom)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(radiator, be warm at top at bottom)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be cold at bottom)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be warm at top)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(radiator, be hot at bottom)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(radiator, be warm at top)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(radiator, be cold at bottom)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(radiator, be warm at top)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(radiator, be cold at bottom)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(radiator, stay at bottom)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(radiator, be warm at bottom)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be cold at top)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(radiator, get at top)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(radiator, be hot at top)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(radiator, be cold at top)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(radiator, be warm at top)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(radiator, be cold at bottom)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(radiator, be cold at top)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(radiator, get at top)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(radiator, be cold at top)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(radiator, get at top)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(radiator, get at top)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(radiator, be hot at top at bottom)