radiator: be under window

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cooling device
Weight: 0.68
, heating element
Weight: 0.62
, heater
Weight: 0.56
, application
Weight: 0.55
, unit
Weight: 0.54
Siblings hose
Weight: 0.54
, heat sink
Weight: 0.34
, electric heater
Weight: 0.33
, compressor
Weight: 0.33
, heat
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be under window 1.00
be under windows 0.90
go under windows 0.89
be put under windows 0.89
have under windows places 0.86
be placed under windows 0.86
be placed directly under windows 0.83
be located under windows 0.83
be in front of windows 0.82
be put in front of windows 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(heater, be under windows)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(radiator, be under window)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(heater, be placed under windows)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(radiator, be under window)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(heater, be under windows)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(heater, be placed under windows)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(heater, be placed under windows)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(heater, be under windows)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(heater, be under windows)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(radiator, be under window)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(heater, be placed under windows)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(radiator, be under window)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(radiator, be under window)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(radiator, go under windows)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(radiator, go under windows)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(radiator, be under windows)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(radiator, be under windows)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(radiator, be put under windows)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(radiator, be put under windows)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(radiator, go under windows)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(radiator, be placed under windows)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(radiator, be under windows)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(radiator, be put under windows)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(radiator, be placed under windows)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(radiator, be placed directly under windows)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(radiator, be placed under windows)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(radiator, be in front of windows)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(radiator, be located under windows)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(radiator, be put in front of windows)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(radiator, be placed directly under windows)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(radiator, be located under windows)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(radiator, be in front of windows)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(radiator, be in front of windows)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(radiator, be placed directly under windows)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(radiator, be put in front of windows)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(radiator, be put in front of windows)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(radiator, be located under windows)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be in front of windows)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be placed directly under windows)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be placed under windows)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be put in front of windows)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be put under windows)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(radiator, go under windows)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be located under windows)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be under windows)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be under window)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(radiator, be under window)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(heater, be placed under windows)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(heater, be under windows)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(heater, be under windows)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(radiator, be under window)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(heater, be placed under windows)