radio telescope: need antenna

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents instrument
Weight: 0.63
, technology
Weight: 0.58
, device
Weight: 0.52
, method
Weight: 0.43
Siblings telescope
Weight: 0.39
, radio receiver
Weight: 0.34
, debt instrument
Weight: 0.34
, magnetic compass
Weight: 0.34
, musical instrument
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
need antenna 1.00
need big antenna 0.98
need antennae 0.88
need larger than optical telescopes 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(radio telescope, need antenna)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(radio telescope, need antenna)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(radio telescope, need antenna)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, need big antenna)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(radio telescope, need antenna)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, need antennae)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(radio telescope, need antenna)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(radio telescope, need big antenna)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(radio telescope, need antenna)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, need larger than optical telescopes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(radio telescope, need antenna)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(radio telescope, need antennae)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(radio telescope, need antenna)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(radio telescope, need antennae)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(radio telescope, need antenna)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(radio telescope, need larger than optical telescopes)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(radio telescope, need antenna)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, need larger than optical telescopes)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(radio telescope, need antenna)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(radio telescope, need larger than optical telescopes)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(radio telescope, need antenna)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, need big antenna)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(radio telescope, need antenna)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, need antennae)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(radio telescope, need antenna)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(radio telescope, need big antenna)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(radio telescope, need antenna)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(radio telescope, need antenna)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, need antenna)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(radio telescope, need antenna)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(radio telescope, need antenna)