radium: is costly

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents substance
Weight: 0.60
, element
Weight: 0.58
, metal
Weight: 0.56
, chemical
Weight: 0.55
, alpha particle
Weight: 0.54
Siblings arsenic
Weight: 0.35
, sodium fluoride
Weight: 0.35
, mercury
Weight: 0.35
, chromium
Weight: 0.35
, fluoride
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is costly 1.00
is very costly 0.94
is expensive 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(radium, is costly)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(chromium, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(radium, is costly)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(chromium, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(chromium, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(radium, is costly)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(radium, is costly)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(radium, is costly)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(radium, is very costly)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(radium, is costly)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(radium, is very costly)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(radium, is costly)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(radium, is very costly)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(radium, is costly)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(radium, is very costly)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(radium, is costly)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(radium, is expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(radium, is costly)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(radium, is expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(radium, is costly)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(radium, is expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(radium, is costly)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(radium, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(radium, is costly)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(radium, is costly)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(radium, is costly)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(radium, is costly)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(radium, is costly)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(radium, is costly)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(chromium, is expensive)