ragtime: is difficult

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents musical
Weight: 0.68
, style
Weight: 0.68
, film
Weight: 0.58
, form
Weight: 0.55
, music
Weight: 0.54
Siblings baroque
Weight: 0.36
, rock music
Weight: 0.35
, classical music
Weight: 0.35
, jazz
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is difficult 1.00
is hard 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ragtime, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(jazz, is difficult)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ragtime, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(classical music, is hard)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ragtime, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(jazz, is hard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(ragtime, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(jazz, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(jazz, is difficult)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(ragtime, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(jazz, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(jazz, is hard)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(ragtime, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(classical music, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(classical music, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(ragtime, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(ragtime, is difficult)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(ragtime, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(ragtime, is hard)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(ragtime, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(ragtime, is hard)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(ragtime, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(ragtime, is hard)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(ragtime, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(ragtime, is hard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(ragtime, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(ragtime, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ragtime, is difficult)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(ragtime, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(ragtime, is difficult)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ragtime, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(jazz, is difficult)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ragtime, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(jazz, is hard)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ragtime, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(classical music, is hard)