raising: is terrible

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents subject
Weight: 0.51
, matter
Weight: 0.49
, stage
Weight: 0.47
, thing
Weight: 0.45
, event
Weight: 0.41
Siblings raise
Weight: 0.32
, public speaking
Weight: 0.30
, drawing
Weight: 0.30
, talking
Weight: 0.29
, financing
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
is terrible 1.00
is good bad idea 0.78
has quality bad 0.77
is good thing 0.76
be good thing do 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(raising, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(raise, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(raising, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(drawing, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(raising, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(talking, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(raising, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(financing, is good thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(raising, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(financing, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(financing, is good thing)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(raising, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(raise, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(raise, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(raising, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(talking, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(talking, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(raising, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(drawing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(drawing, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(raising, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(raising, is terrible)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(raising, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(raising, is good bad idea)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(raising, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(raising, is good bad idea)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(raising, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(raising, is good bad idea)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(raising, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(raising, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(raising, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(raising, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(raising, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(raising, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(raising, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(raising, is good bad idea)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(raising, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(raising, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(raising, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(raising, is good thing)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(raising, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(raising, be good thing do)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(raising, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(raising, be good thing do)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(raising, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(raising, is good thing)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(raising, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(raising, is good thing)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(raising, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(raising, is good thing)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(raising, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(raising, be good thing do)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(raising, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(raising, be good thing do)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(raising, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(raising, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(raising, is terrible)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(raising, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(raising, is terrible)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(raising, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(financing, is good thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(raising, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(raise, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(raising, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(talking, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(raising, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(drawing, has quality bad)