ramen: is like

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.47
, chinese food
Weight: 0.45
, noodle
Weight: 0.42
, soup
Weight: 0.39
, staple
Weight: 0.37
Siblings sushi
Weight: 0.33
, dumpling
Weight: 0.33
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.32
, burrito
Weight: 0.32
, potato salad
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is like 1.00
is same everywhere 0.78
is okay 0.77
want essendant 0.76
is great 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(soup, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ramen, is like)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(chinese food, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ramen, is like)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(staple, want essendant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ramen, is like)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(chinese food, is same everywhere) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ramen, is like)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(ramen, is like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(chinese food, is same everywhere)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(ramen, is like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(staple, want essendant)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(ramen, is like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(chinese food, is great)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(ramen, is like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(soup, is great)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ramen, is like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, is same everywhere)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ramen, is like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(soup, is great)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ramen, is like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, is great)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ramen, is like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(staple, want essendant)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(soup, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(ramen, is like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(ramen, is like)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(chinese food, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(ramen, is like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(ramen, is like)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(staple, want essendant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(ramen, is like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(ramen, is like)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(chinese food, is same everywhere) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(ramen, is like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(ramen, is like)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(ramen, is like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(ramen, is like)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(ramen, is like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ramen, is like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ramen, is like)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(ramen, is like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ramen, is like)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ramen, is like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(chinese food, is same everywhere)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ramen, is like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(staple, want essendant)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ramen, is like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(chinese food, is great)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ramen, is like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(soup, is great)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(ramen, is like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(chinese food, is same everywhere)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(ramen, is like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(staple, want essendant)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(ramen, is like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(chinese food, is great)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(ramen, is like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(soup, is great)