ramen: is online expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.47
, chinese food
Weight: 0.45
, noodle
Weight: 0.42
, soup
Weight: 0.39
, staple
Weight: 0.37
Siblings sushi
Weight: 0.33
, dumpling
Weight: 0.33
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.32
, burrito
Weight: 0.32
, potato salad
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is online expensive 1.00
is online 0.91
is expensive 0.86
have internet 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(noodle, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(ramen, is online expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(staple, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(ramen, is online expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(dish, have internet)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(ramen, is online expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(ramen, is online expensive)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(dish, have internet)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(ramen, is online expensive)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(staple, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(ramen, is online expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(noodle, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(ramen, is online expensive)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(noodle, is expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(ramen, is online expensive)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(staple, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(ramen, is online expensive)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(dish, have internet)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(ramen, is online expensive)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sushi, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(ramen, is online expensive)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(dumpling, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(noodle, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(ramen, is online expensive)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(ramen, is online expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(staple, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(ramen, is online expensive)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(ramen, is online expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(dish, have internet)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(ramen, is online expensive)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(ramen, is online expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(ramen, is online expensive)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(dumpling, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(dumpling, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(ramen, is online expensive)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(sushi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(sushi, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(ramen, is online expensive)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(ramen, is online expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(ramen, is online expensive)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(ramen, is online)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(ramen, is online expensive)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(ramen, is online)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(ramen, is online expensive)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(ramen, is online)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(ramen, is online expensive)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(ramen, is online)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(ramen, is online expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ramen, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(ramen, is online expensive)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(ramen, is expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(ramen, is online expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(ramen, is expensive)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(ramen, is online expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(ramen, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(ramen, is online expensive)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(ramen, is online expensive)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(ramen, is online expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(ramen, is online expensive)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(ramen, is online expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(ramen, is online expensive)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(dish, have internet)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(ramen, is online expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(staple, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(ramen, is online expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(noodle, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(ramen, is online expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(sushi, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(ramen, is online expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(dumpling, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(ramen, is online expensive)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(dish, have internet)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(ramen, is online expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(staple, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(ramen, is online expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(noodle, is expensive)