ranch: be at new mexico

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.57
, horse
Weight: 0.57
, farm
Weight: 0.55
Siblings matador
Weight: 0.40
, mustang
Weight: 0.33
, campsite
Weight: 0.33
, vineyard
Weight: 0.32
, campground
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at new mexico 1.00
be at in texas 0.80
be at florida 0.80
be at ocala florida 0.80
be at nevada 0.80
be at canada 0.79
be at spain 0.79
be at minnesota 0.79
be at oklahoma 0.79
be at new york city 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(horse, be at florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ranch, be at new mexico)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(horse, be at oklahoma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ranch, be at new mexico)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(horse, be at in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ranch, be at new mexico)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(horse, be at canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ranch, be at new mexico)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(horse, be at new york city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ranch, be at new mexico)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(ranch, be at new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(horse, be at new york city)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(ranch, be at new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(horse, be at canada)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(ranch, be at new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(horse, be at in texas)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(ranch, be at new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(horse, be at oklahoma)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(ranch, be at new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(horse, be at florida)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be at new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(horse, be at canada)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be at new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(horse, be at new york city)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be at new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(horse, be at florida)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be at new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(horse, be at in texas)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be at new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(horse, be at oklahoma)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(horse, be at in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(ranch, be at new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(ranch, be at new mexico)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(horse, be at florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(ranch, be at new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(ranch, be at new mexico)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(horse, be at canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(ranch, be at new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(ranch, be at new mexico)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(horse, be at oklahoma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(ranch, be at new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(ranch, be at new mexico)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(horse, be at new york city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(ranch, be at new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(ranch, be at new mexico)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(ranch, be at new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(ranch, be at new mexico)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(ranch, be at new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be at oklahoma)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(ranch, be at new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(ranch, be at oklahoma)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(ranch, be at new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(ranch, be at oklahoma)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(ranch, be at new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(ranch, be at nevada)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(ranch, be at new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be at nevada)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(ranch, be at new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ranch, be at new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be at new mexico)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(ranch, be at new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ranch, be at new mexico)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be at new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(horse, be at florida)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be at new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(horse, be at oklahoma)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be at new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(horse, be at in texas)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be at new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(horse, be at canada)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be at new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(horse, be at new york city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(ranch, be at new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(horse, be at florida)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(ranch, be at new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(horse, be at oklahoma)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(ranch, be at new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(horse, be at in texas)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(ranch, be at new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(horse, be at canada)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(ranch, be at new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(horse, be at new york city)