rancher: have donkeys

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents individual
Weight: 0.57
, customer
Weight: 0.55
, person
Weight: 0.51
, business people
Weight: 0.51
Siblings farmer
Weight: 0.33
, businessman
Weight: 0.31
, real estate agent
Weight: 0.31
, veterinarian
Weight: 0.31
, elderly person
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
have donkeys 1.00
keep donkeys 0.97
have horses 0.78
dehorn cattle 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(rancher, have donkeys)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(rancher, have donkeys)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(rancher, have donkeys)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(rancher, keep donkeys)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(rancher, have donkeys)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(rancher, keep donkeys)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(rancher, have donkeys)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(rancher, keep donkeys)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(rancher, have donkeys)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(rancher, keep donkeys)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(rancher, have donkeys)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(rancher, dehorn cattle)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(rancher, have donkeys)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(rancher, dehorn cattle)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(rancher, have donkeys)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(rancher, dehorn cattle)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(rancher, have donkeys)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(rancher, have horses)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(rancher, have donkeys)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(rancher, dehorn cattle)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(rancher, have donkeys)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(rancher, have horses)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(rancher, have donkeys)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(rancher, have horses)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(rancher, have donkeys)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(rancher, have horses)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(rancher, have donkeys)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(rancher, have donkeys)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(rancher, have donkeys)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(rancher, have donkeys)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(rancher, have donkeys)