rancher: is lollipops

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents individual
Weight: 0.57
, customer
Weight: 0.55
, person
Weight: 0.51
, business people
Weight: 0.51
Siblings farmer
Weight: 0.33
, businessman
Weight: 0.31
, real estate agent
Weight: 0.31
, veterinarian
Weight: 0.31
, elderly person
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is lollipops 1.00
lollipops 1.00
is candy 0.80
is best candy 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rancher, is lollipops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(rancher, is lollipops)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(rancher, is lollipops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(rancher, lollipops)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(rancher, is lollipops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(rancher, lollipops)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(rancher, is lollipops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(rancher, lollipops)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rancher, is lollipops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(rancher, lollipops)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(rancher, is lollipops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(rancher, is candy)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(rancher, is lollipops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(rancher, is candy)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(rancher, is lollipops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rancher, is best candy)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rancher, is lollipops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(rancher, is candy)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(rancher, is lollipops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(rancher, is candy)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(rancher, is lollipops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(rancher, is best candy)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rancher, is lollipops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(rancher, is best candy)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(rancher, is lollipops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(rancher, is best candy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(rancher, is lollipops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(rancher, is lollipops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(rancher, is lollipops)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rancher, is lollipops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(rancher, is lollipops)