range: be nuclear bombers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents distance
Weight: 0.61
, area
Weight: 0.60
, difference
Weight: 0.58
, quality
Weight: 0.57
Siblings alps
Weight: 0.44
, skeet
Weight: 0.42
, angle
Weight: 0.31
, accuracy
Weight: 0.31
, gap
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be nuclear bombers 1.00
be nuclear bombers effective 0.98
be bombers 0.93
be bombers effective 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(range, be nuclear bombers)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(range, be nuclear bombers)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(range, be nuclear bombers)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(range, be nuclear bombers effective)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(range, be nuclear bombers)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(range, be nuclear bombers effective)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(range, be nuclear bombers)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(range, be bombers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(range, be nuclear bombers)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(range, be bombers effective)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(range, be nuclear bombers)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(range, be bombers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(range, be nuclear bombers)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(range, be nuclear bombers effective)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(range, be nuclear bombers)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(range, be bombers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(range, be nuclear bombers)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(range, be nuclear bombers effective)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(range, be nuclear bombers)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(range, be bombers effective)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(range, be nuclear bombers)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(range, be bombers effective)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(range, be nuclear bombers)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(range, be bombers)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(range, be nuclear bombers)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(range, be bombers effective)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(range, be nuclear bombers)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(range, be nuclear bombers)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(range, be nuclear bombers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(range, be nuclear bombers)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(range, be nuclear bombers)