rank: be based win

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.61
, privilege
Weight: 0.55
, service
Weight: 0.52
, man
Weight: 0.52
Siblings ensign
Weight: 0.54
, attribute
Weight: 0.32
, status
Weight: 0.31
, level
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be based win 1.00
show 0 top win streak 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(rank, be based win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(rank, be based win)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(rank, be based win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(rank, show 0 top win streak)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(rank, be based win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rank, show 0 top win streak)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(rank, be based win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(rank, show 0 top win streak)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(rank, be based win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(rank, show 0 top win streak)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(rank, be based win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(rank, be based win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(rank, be based win)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(rank, be based win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(rank, be based win)