raphael: was good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artist
Weight: 0.57
, figure
Weight: 0.53
, painter
Weight: 0.53
, great
Weight: 0.51
, name
Weight: 0.50
Siblings dancer
Weight: 0.28
, pianist
Weight: 0.28
, exhibit
Weight: 0.28
, composer
Weight: 0.28
, domain name
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
was good 1.00
is kellman 0.76
is hythloday 0.76
is varane 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(raphael, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(raphael, was good)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(raphael, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(raphael, is varane)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(raphael, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(raphael, is kellman)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(raphael, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(raphael, is hythloday)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(raphael, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(raphael, is kellman)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(raphael, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(raphael, is hythloday)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(raphael, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(raphael, is kellman)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(raphael, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(raphael, is hythloday)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(raphael, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(raphael, is varane)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(raphael, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(raphael, is varane)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(raphael, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(raphael, is hythloday)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(raphael, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(raphael, is kellman)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(raphael, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(raphael, is varane)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(raphael, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(raphael, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(raphael, was good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(raphael, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(raphael, was good)