rat: be harmful to humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.70
, rodent
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.65
Siblings kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.56
, cockroach
Weight: 0.37
, rabbit
Weight: 0.37
, lizard
Weight: 0.37
, monkey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be harmful to humans 1.00
be important to humans 0.90
be useful to humans 0.89
be different from humans 0.87
help humans 0.87
kill humans 0.85
affects humans 0.84
be scared of humans 0.82
interact with humans 0.81
attack humans 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, be scared of humans)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(rat, be harmful to humans)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(rat, be harmful to humans)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, be scared of humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(rat, be harmful to humans)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, be scared of humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(rat, be harmful to humans)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(cockroach, be harmful to humans)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, be scared of humans)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(rat, be harmful to humans)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(rat, be harmful to humans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(rat, be harmful to humans)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(cockroach, be harmful to humans)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(cockroach, be harmful to humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(rat, be harmful to humans)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(rat, be harmful to humans)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(rat, be harmful to humans)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(rat, be important to humans)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(rat, be harmful to humans)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(rat, help humans)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(rat, be harmful to humans)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(rat, help humans)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(rat, be harmful to humans)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(rat, be scared of humans)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(rat, be harmful to humans)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(rat, help humans)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(rat, be harmful to humans)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(rat, be important to humans)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(rat, be harmful to humans)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(rat, be important to humans)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(rat, be harmful to humans)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rat, be important to humans)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(rat, be harmful to humans)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(rat, be scared of humans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(rat, be harmful to humans)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(rat, be scared of humans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(rat, be harmful to humans)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(rat, help humans)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(rat, be harmful to humans)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(rat, be scared of humans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(rat, be harmful to humans)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(rat, be harmful to humans)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(rat, be harmful to humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(rat, be harmful to humans)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(rat, be harmful to humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(rat, be harmful to humans)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, be scared of humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(rat, be harmful to humans)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cockroach, be harmful to humans)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(rat, be harmful to humans)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, be scared of humans)