rate: be higher in child

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents interest rate
Weight: 0.91
, tax
Weight: 0.62
, amount
Weight: 0.60
, parameter
Weight: 0.60
Siblings inflation
Weight: 0.68
, cent
Weight: 0.60
, maximum
Weight: 0.55
, initial interest rate
Weight: 0.36
, income tax
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be higher in child 1.00
increased in pregnancy 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(rate, be higher in child)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(rate, be higher in child)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(rate, be higher in child)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(rate, increased in pregnancy)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(rate, be higher in child)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(rate, increased in pregnancy)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(rate, be higher in child)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(rate, increased in pregnancy)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(rate, be higher in child)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(rate, increased in pregnancy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(rate, be higher in child)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(rate, be higher in child)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(rate, be higher in child)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(rate, be higher in child)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(rate, be higher in child)