rate: differ for bismark

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents interest rate
Weight: 0.91
, tax
Weight: 0.62
, amount
Weight: 0.60
, parameter
Weight: 0.60
Siblings inflation
Weight: 0.68
, cent
Weight: 0.60
, maximum
Weight: 0.55
, initial interest rate
Weight: 0.36
, income tax
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
differ for bismark 1.00
vary in different countries 0.85
differ for new york 0.84
vary with changes in temperature 0.77
be different 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(rate, differ for bismark)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(rate, differ for bismark)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(rate, differ for bismark)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(rate, differ for new york)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(rate, differ for bismark)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(rate, vary with changes in temperature)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(rate, differ for bismark)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(rate, vary in different countries)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(rate, differ for bismark)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(rate, vary in different countries)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(rate, differ for bismark)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(rate, vary with changes in temperature)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(rate, differ for bismark)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rate, be different)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(rate, differ for bismark)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(rate, vary in different countries)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(rate, differ for bismark)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(rate, be different)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(rate, differ for bismark)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(rate, be different)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(rate, differ for bismark)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(rate, differ for new york)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(rate, differ for bismark)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(rate, vary with changes in temperature)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(rate, differ for bismark)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(rate, differ for new york)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(rate, differ for bismark)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(rate, vary with changes in temperature)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(rate, differ for bismark)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(rate, vary in different countries)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(rate, differ for bismark)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(rate, differ for new york)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(rate, differ for bismark)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(rate, be different)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(rate, differ for bismark)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(rate, differ for bismark)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(rate, differ for bismark)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(rate, differ for bismark)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(rate, differ for bismark)