rate: were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents interest rate
Weight: 0.91
, tax
Weight: 0.62
, amount
Weight: 0.60
, parameter
Weight: 0.60
Siblings inflation
Weight: 0.68
, cent
Weight: 0.60
, maximum
Weight: 0.55
, initial interest rate
Weight: 0.36
, income tax
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york 1.00
were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal york 1.00
were for health problems high among residents of love canal new york 0.99
were for health problems high among residents of love canal york 0.99
were for serious health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york 0.99
were for serious health problems unhigh among residents of love canal york 0.98
were for serious health problems high among residents of love canal new york 0.98
were for serious health problems high among residents of love canal york 0.98
were for health problems unhigh among residents 0.90
were for health problems high among residents 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rate, were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(rate, were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(rate, were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(rate, were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal york)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(rate, were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(rate, were for health problems high among residents of love canal new york)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(rate, were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(rate, were for health problems high among residents of love canal york)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(rate, were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(rate, were for serious health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(rate, were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(rate, were for serious health problems unhigh among residents of love canal york)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(rate, were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(rate, were for serious health problems high among residents of love canal new york)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(rate, were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(rate, were for serious health problems high among residents of love canal york)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rate, were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(rate, were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal york)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(rate, were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(rate, were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal york)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rate, were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(rate, were for serious health problems unhigh among residents of love canal york)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(rate, were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(rate, were for serious health problems unhigh among residents of love canal york)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rate, were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(rate, were for health problems high among residents of love canal york)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rate, were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(rate, were for serious health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rate, were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(rate, were for health problems high among residents of love canal new york)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rate, were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(rate, were for serious health problems high among residents of love canal york)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(rate, were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(rate, were for health problems high among residents of love canal york)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(rate, were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(rate, were for serious health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rate, were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(rate, were for serious health problems high among residents of love canal new york)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(rate, were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(rate, were for serious health problems high among residents of love canal york)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(rate, were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(rate, were for health problems high among residents of love canal new york)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(rate, were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(rate, were for serious health problems high among residents of love canal new york)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(rate, were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(rate, were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal york)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(rate, were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(rate, were for serious health problems unhigh among residents of love canal york)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(rate, were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(rate, were for serious health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(rate, were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(rate, were for serious health problems high among residents of love canal york)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(rate, were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(rate, were for health problems high among residents of love canal york)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(rate, were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(rate, were for serious health problems high among residents of love canal new york)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(rate, were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rate, were for health problems high among residents of love canal new york)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(rate, were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(rate, were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(rate, were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rate, were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(rate, were for health problems unhigh among residents of love canal new york)