ratio: be found in nature

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, variable
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.58
, parameter
Weight: 0.58
Siblings golden ratio
Weight: 0.72
, roe
Weight: 0.52
, peg
Weight: 0.45
, interest rate
Weight: 0.34
, rate
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be found in nature 1.00
be in nature 0.91
appear in nature 0.89
exist in nature 0.86
occur in nature 0.84
be found out in quantity surveying 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be found in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(golden ratio, be found in nature)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be found in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(rate, be found out in quantity surveying)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be found in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(golden ratio, exist in nature)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be found in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(golden ratio, be in nature)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be found in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(golden ratio, occur in nature)
...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ratio, be found in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(golden ratio, be found in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(golden ratio, be found in nature)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ratio, be found in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(golden ratio, be in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(golden ratio, be in nature)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ratio, be found in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(golden ratio, appear in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(golden ratio, appear in nature)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ratio, be found in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(golden ratio, exist in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(golden ratio, exist in nature)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ratio, be found in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(golden ratio, occur in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(golden ratio, occur in nature)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ratio, be found in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(ratio, be found in nature)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(ratio, be found in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(ratio, be in nature)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ratio, be found in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(ratio, be in nature)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(ratio, be found in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(ratio, appear in nature)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(ratio, be found in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(ratio, be in nature)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ratio, be found in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(ratio, appear in nature)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(ratio, be found in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(ratio, be found in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be found in nature)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ratio, be found in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(ratio, be found in nature)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be found in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(golden ratio, be in nature)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be found in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(golden ratio, appear in nature)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be found in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(golden ratio, be found in nature)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be found in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(golden ratio, occur in nature)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be found in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(golden ratio, exist in nature)
...