ratio: be in california work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, variable
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.58
, parameter
Weight: 0.58
Siblings golden ratio
Weight: 0.72
, roe
Weight: 0.52
, peg
Weight: 0.45
, interest rate
Weight: 0.34
, rate
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in california work 1.00
is kansas city missouri 0.79
be in japan 0.77
be in india 0.76
is kansas city mo 0.76
go up in canada 0.75
harm mexico 0.75
be low in japan 0.75
be in japan low 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(topic, is kansas city missouri) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ratio, be in california work)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(topic, is kansas city mo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ratio, be in california work)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(factor, harm mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ratio, be in california work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ratio, be in california work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(topic, is kansas city missouri)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ratio, be in california work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(topic, is kansas city mo)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ratio, be in california work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(factor, harm mexico)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be in california work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(factor, harm mexico)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be in california work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(topic, is kansas city missouri)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be in california work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(topic, is kansas city mo)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be in california work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, go up in canada)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be in california work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, be low in japan)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(topic, is kansas city missouri) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(ratio, be in california work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(ratio, be in california work)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(topic, is kansas city mo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(ratio, be in california work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(ratio, be in california work)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(factor, harm mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(ratio, be in california work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(ratio, be in california work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ratio, be in california work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(interest rate, go up in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(interest rate, go up in canada)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ratio, be in california work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(interest rate, be low in japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(interest rate, be low in japan)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ratio, be in california work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(ratio, be in california work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(ratio, be in california work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ratio, be in california work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be in california work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ratio, be in california work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ratio, be in california work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be in california work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(factor, harm mexico)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be in california work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(topic, is kansas city mo)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be in california work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(topic, is kansas city missouri)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be in california work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(interest rate, go up in canada)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be in california work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(interest rate, be low in japan)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(ratio, be in california work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(topic, is kansas city missouri)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(ratio, be in california work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(topic, is kansas city mo)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(ratio, be in california work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(factor, harm mexico)